Jellyfish Launches New Dashboard for GitHub Copilot Usage
In a move to bridge the gap between executive perception and engineer reality concerning GenAI adoption, Jellyfish, a well-known Engineering Management Platform, has introduced its Copilot Dashboard. This innovative tool is designed to provide detailed insights into the adoption, utilization, and impact of GitHub Copilot among engineering teams within various organizations.
The introduction of the Copilot Dashboard comes in response to intriguing findings from Jellyfish's 2024 State of Engineering Management Report. The report reveals that a staggering 90% of engineering organizations have adopted some form of Generative AI, including GitHub Copilot. However, there seems to be a significant disconnect between the perceptions of executives and the day-to-day realities experienced by engineers regarding this technology's adoption and impact.
Addressing the Perception Gap
The Copilot Dashboard is meticulously designed to slash through this misalignment by providing objective metrics that offer a clearer picture of how GitHub Copilot is being adopted and utilized within teams. Offering a suite of key metrics such as cycle time, code commits, and delivery acceleration, the dashboard enables engineering leaders to gauge the return on investment (ROI) vis-à-vis GitHub Copilot. By doing so, they can identify enhancements in developer workflows and strategically maximize the opportunities Copilot presents.
Krishna Kannan, Head of Product at Jellyfish, highlighted the necessity for these objective metrics. According to Kannan, while many organizations have eagerly embraced Generative AI, there's a pressing need to measure its tangible impact accurately. The Copilot Dashboard has been developed precisely to fulfill this requirement, ensuring that engineering leaders can make informed decisions that align with both executive goals and engineering realities.
Key Metrics and Insights
At the core of the Copilot Dashboard are several vital metrics that can offer deep insights into the performance and utilization of GitHub Copilot. These metrics include:
- Cycle Time: The duration from the initial code commit to its final implementation. This metric helps in evaluating the efficiency and speed of the development process.
- Code Commits: The frequency and volume of code changes submitted by developers. This can indicate the productivity and engagement levels of the engineering team.
- Delivery Acceleration: The speed at which products are delivered from the development stage through to deployment. This metric is crucial for understanding how quickly engineering teams can bring products to market.
By monitoring these metrics, the Copilot Dashboard enables engineering leaders to pinpoint areas where GitHub Copilot is having the most significant impact and where improvements can be made. Such insights are indispensable for optimizing workflows and enhancing overall team productivity.
Enhancing ROI and Developer Experience
One of the standout features of the Copilot Dashboard is its ability to measure the ROI of GitHub Copilot. With organizations investing considerable resources into GenAI technologies, having a tool that quantifies the returns can significantly influence strategic decision-making. Engineering leaders can assess how Copilot is affecting their teams' performance and make data-driven choices to either continue, scale, or pivot their GenAI initiatives.
Additionally, the dashboard offers valuable insights into changes in developer workflows. Understanding how these workflows evolve with tools like GitHub Copilot is crucial for engineering leaders aiming to foster a conducive environment that enhances developer efficiency and satisfaction. This, in turn, can lead to better retention rates and a more motivated engineering team.
Part of a Larger Ecosystem
The Copilot Dashboard is not a standalone product but rather an integral part of Jellyfish's comprehensive product suite, which includes Jellyfish DevEx. The DevEx platform offers extensive visibility into engineering organizations and their respective work processes, enabling a holistic view of team performance and productivity.
By integrating the Copilot Dashboard with DevEx, engineering leaders can achieve a more nuanced understanding of their teams' dynamics. This integration allows for a seamless flow of information and insights, empowering leaders to make more informed and strategic decisions.
In conclusion, Jellyfish's launch of the Copilot Dashboard marks a significant step forward in engineering management. By providing objective metrics and insights, the dashboard empowers engineering leaders to bridge the gap between executive expectations and engineer reality regarding GenAI adoption. This innovative tool not only enhances the understanding of GitHub Copilot's impact but also optimizes its utilization, ultimately leading to more efficient and productive engineering teams.
As organizations continue to navigate the complexities of technology adoption, tools like the Copilot Dashboard will become increasingly invaluable. By aligning perceptions with reality and offering actionable insights, Jellyfish is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of engineering management.
Posts Comments
sunil kumar June 7, 2024 AT 13:00
The Copilot Dashboard is a step in the right direction, but I wonder how much of the data is skewed by teams that use Copilot only for boilerplate or comments rather than actual logic. The metrics might look great on paper, but if developers are just letting AI write their variable names, are we really accelerating delivery-or just automating busywork?
Derek Pholms June 8, 2024 AT 02:32
Oh wow. Another dashboard. Let me grab my monocle and monocle-shaped coffee mug while I stare at this heatmap of ‘code commits’ like it’s the Rosetta Stone of productivity. Meanwhile, real engineers are still fighting merge conflicts, debugging legacy code, and explaining to managers why ‘acceleration’ doesn’t mean ‘write more code faster’-it means ‘stop forcing us to write code we don’t understand.’
But sure, let’s quantify the soul-crushing efficiency of AI-assisted copy-paste. Next up: the ‘Emotional Exhaustion Index’ metric. I’ll donate my tears to the DevEx API.
musa dogan June 9, 2024 AT 12:07
Let’s be real-this isn’t a dashboard, it’s a corporate placebo. You think your CTO cares about cycle time? No. He cares about the PowerPoint slide that says ‘AI Adoption Up 90%’ so he can get his bonus. Meanwhile, junior devs are drowning in Copilot-generated nonsense that breaks CI/CD, and now we’re supposed to worship a dashboard that turns their confusion into KPIs? This isn’t progress-it’s performative analytics dressed in SaaS glitter.
And don’t get me started on ‘delivery acceleration.’ You mean the same team that shipped a 3-month project in 3 weeks last year because they ignored the AI and just talked to each other? Yeah, that’s not in the metrics. The dashboard doesn’t measure courage. It doesn’t measure trust. It measures what the spreadsheet wants to see.
This is the same dance we did with Jira tickets and ‘story points.’ We turned human work into numbers so execs could feel like they’re leading. But the numbers lie. Always.
Mark Dodak June 10, 2024 AT 07:22
I appreciate the intent behind this dashboard, and I think it’s a useful tool for teams that are struggling to communicate the value of AI tools to leadership. But I also think it’s important to recognize that metrics like cycle time and code commits are inherently flawed as standalone indicators of productivity. Engineering isn’t a factory line-you can’t measure creativity or problem-solving with a stopwatch and a commit counter. The real value of Copilot isn’t in how many lines of code it generates, but in how it frees up mental bandwidth for deeper thinking, for architectural decisions, for mentoring junior devs. Those things don’t show up in graphs.
That said, if this tool helps bridge the gap between engineering teams and management by giving leadership something tangible to look at, then it’s a net positive. Just don’t let it become the only thing people pay attention to. The human element still matters more than any metric ever could.
Jason Lo June 10, 2024 AT 17:19
If your team needs a dashboard to tell you whether AI is helping, you’re already doing it wrong. Real engineers don’t need metrics to know if Copilot is useful-they just use it or don’t. If you’re measuring ‘delivery acceleration’ instead of code quality, you’re not managing engineering-you’re managing fear. And if your CTO thinks this dashboard proves ROI, he’s the reason your tech debt is growing faster than your salary.
Write a comment